A repeating folio
Standing health watch
The same marks, issued on an agreed cadence, so the night shift can compare this month’s lag hatches with the last instead of starting from a blank wall.
- Format
- Recurring briefing
- Span
- Fortnightly or monthly issues, three-month minimum
- Where
- Remote observation; quarterly walkthrough in Tbilisi or by video
- Charge
- Retainer quoted after a first health review
A standing health watch is for crews who already sat a pipeline health review and want the same hatches again, on a calendar, without commissioning a new study from zero.
Each issue is a short folio: lag against the same cutover hours, retry stains, and a note only where a handoff changed shape. We do not rewrite the atlas for fashion. The point is comparison — this month’s billing extract against last month’s.
Cadence
Fortnightly or monthly, agreed at the start. Three months is the shortest run; a single extra month is not a watch, it is a second review. Once a quarter we walk the latest sheet with the crew so marks that have gone stale get retired.
What we need from you
The same log path as the original review, left open for the watch period. If a feed is retired or a new extract joins the family, write before the next issue — we will not silently add columns.
What a watch is not
It is not a night operator. If a feed stalls at two in the morning, your crew still handles the rerun. The watch will show that stall on the next sheet. For a night that must be reconstructed before the director’s meeting, commission an incident recap.
Ask for a watch only after a review has filed its folio. We will not start a repeating picture on a family we have not yet marked.